R Magic Brow

A transgender-identifying reality television star has been arrested for multiple felonies related to child molestation allegations.Sidney Favors is known by stage name Sidney Starr and has been cast in numerous shows including "Love & Hip Hop" and "Baddies."Favors was booked under charges of sexual battery against a child under 16 years of age.On Monday, the Hapeville Police Department said the 37-year-old was arrested on Sunday at the Embassy Suites hotel on International Boulevard.Favors was booked on charges of sexual battery against a child under 16 years of age, aggravated child molestation, and sodomy, according to records from the Fulton County Sheriff's Office."Because this case involves a juvenile, no additional information will be released from our agency," said the Hapeville Police.A TMZ report says Favors allegedly confessed to performing oral sex on the minor in a hotel in Hapeville.Favors had become famous after claiming to have had a sexual relationship with the rapper Chingy. The artist denied the claims, and Favors later admitted fabricating the entire allegation.RELATED: Trans-identifying liberal seems to call for DEATH of Elon Musk over comment about Zizian trans cult Favors' social media account says he is a cast member of "Baddies ATL," "Love & Hip Hop: New York," and "Wild ‘N Out" on MTV.Fulton County Jail records list the transgender-identifying celebrity as a black male.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

On April 28, 2025, Shiloh Hendrix was at the park with her child when she got into a confrontation with a man after she allegedly called his child a racial slur.The man began videotaping her, which he later posted to social media where it went viral.Over a year later, Hendrix has been found guilty of disorderly conduct against the man operating the camera, and BlazeTV host Steve Deace — alongside millions of freedom-loving Americans — isn’t happy with the outcome.“What does this case tell us about the current state of the culture we’re in?” Deace asks Auron MacIntyre on the “Steve Deace Show.”“That it is illegal to be white,” he answers, pointing out that the man in the video “was accused of sexual assault against a 16-year-old.”“So, we have a Somali criminal, sexual assaulter, doing this, creeping on this woman with a child in the park, but she says the same word he does,” he explains. “They both say exactly the same word, but one of them was convicted of a crime for doing that.”“And the only explanation — there’s literally only one — is that she was convicted for being white. And, of course, we see this conviction alongside Anthony Fauci and his testimony this week. And as nice as it was to see Anthony Fauci embarrassed, we all know that pretty much no penalty is coming for Anthony Fauci,” he says.“So, we now live in a country where Shiloh Hendrix can be convicted of a crime, but Anthony Fauci can kill millions of people, destroy the economy and the lives of millions of children, and receive no penalty,” he adds.MacIntyre tells Deace that the justice system is “entirely eroding before our eyes.”“What she’s being judged for, therefore, is her whiteness, because if two black people were saying this to one another in any context, we wouldn’t be here with any kind of a trial in Minnesota or anywhere else,” Deace comments.“We would just call it a rap video,” MacIntyre adds. “And that’s obviously the case. This man was harassing a woman with a child in the park. He has a history of [alleged] sexual violence against minors, but she is the violator here.”“And let’s be clear ... she was found innocent of directing the slur at the child. It was only the slur directed at the man who was harassing her, the [alleged] sexual offender ... who she was ultimately convicted of harassing,” he continues.“Again, this is just a hate speech law,” he adds.Want more from Steve Deace?To enjoy more of Steve's take on national politics, Christian worldview, and principled conservatism with a snarky twist, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Women seem to have had enough of battling over whether their sports can include athletes who were born male.Amid the WNBA's controversy stemming from star player Sophie Cunningham, who simply said girls "shouldn't have to go against biological men" in sports, there have been growing calls for the league to cement through policy that the WNBA is for women only.'The WNBA needs to look in the mirror and do some soul-searching about what it stands for.'According to the WNBA's 2026 collective-bargaining agreement with its players' association, Article XIII, Section 1 declares that "only players who are women are eligible to play in the WNBA."While the definition of what a woman is should go without saying — the WNBA does not provide one — several prominent role-players in the league have suggested that biological reality is not the basis for their opinion on this matter.On Sunday, Minnesota Lynx head coach Cheryl Reeve wore a T-shirt that read, "Trans kids belong" and featured a transgender-themed rainbow.That same night, Golden State Valkyries coach Natalie Nakese compared the issue to being "criticized for my height, for my ethnicity."She added that sports is about "belonging" and "inclusivity."When asked if men should be able to play in the WNBA, Indiana Fever head coach Stephanie White said last week that she is not "educated enough from a scientific standpoint" to make such a determination.She added, "I don't ever believe that exclusion is an answer."These vague sentiments have seemingly pushed prominent women's activists to a boiling point, with many calling for the WNBA to adopt a policy that specifically states only biological women can play in the league."The WNBA needs to look in the mirror and do some soul-searching about what it stands for — fairness in women's sports or not?" said Penny Nance, CEO and president of Concerned Women for America.The CEO said in a press release that the WNBA has "poisoned" itself with activism for years and that it's time for the league to defend young women, not "biological males stealing their opportunities."RELATED: WNBA coach counter-protests Sophie Cunningham with 'trans kids' shirt — Caitlin Clark responds David Berding/Getty ImagesRep. Claudia Tenney (R-N.Y.) has advocated for prohibiting women's sports franchises from receiving tax benefits if they do not prohibit biological men from their teams.Tenney said in June that franchises may claim tax advantages tied to acquisitions, but if she has her way, they would not receive such luxuries if they "undermine" women."Taxpayers should not be subsidizing the erosion of women's sports. ... Women's sports are for women," Tenney declared.Jennifer Sey, founder of pro-women apparel company XX-XY, told Blaze News that there is a broader cultural shift currently on display, but there is still "justice" to be served.Sey pointed to "the growing number of people who will no longer pretend biology is mutable," while adding that protecting young girls from adults "who treat basic reality as a moral offense" should not be controversial.RELATED: WNBA star Sophie Cunningham comes out against men in women's sports: 'I want to protect young girls' Amanda Loman/Getty ImagesMany women's sports leagues have already made "female at birth" policies or outright banned men from competing in their events.The LPGA announced its policy in early December 2024, while British tennis barred men from women's competitive tournaments just days later.About a month after that, English women's field hockey banned trans-identifying males from the sport.This all came before President Trump's executive order titled "Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports" dropped in February 2025. Almost immediately after the order was issued, the NCAA updated its transgender student-athlete participation policy to keep men out of the women's category.The WNBA did not respond to a request from Blaze News regarding the league's definition of a woman.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

In her interview on Sunday with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., CNN talking head Dana Bash launched a defense of the COVID-19 vaccine and CNN host Jake Tapper's infamous buddy Anthony Fauci, who is now the subject of an investigation in Florida.Bash's efforts to downplay both Fauci's involvement in ruinous decisions made during the pandemic and her network's fearmongering did not go over well as Kennedy — neither a stranger to gaslighting from the legacy media nor a shrinking violet — hit back, accusing the CNN host of pushing "nonsense."'The biggest killer of kids in this country today came from these kind of experiments.'At the outset of the interview, Bash challenged Kennedy's long-standing criticism of Fauci, downplaying the influence that Fauci had with regard to America's devastating lockdowns and suggesting that President Donald Trump deserves "some of the blame."Kennedy immediately rejected Bash's defense of Fauci, underscoring that governors had executed lockdowns around the country "because Anthony Fauci was telling them from the top, 'You need to lock down.'"Fauci boasted ad nauseam in his diary about his pandemic-era influence, noting in one instance that California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) decided to shut down schools, bars, and restaurants on the basis of his fear-peddling.Unable to mount a successful defense of Fauci and proving unable to elicit a condemnation of the president from Kennedy, Bash rushed to step on another rake.RELATED: Two Americas, under Fauci, with liberty and justice for none Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call Inc./Getty ImagesCiting unnamed scientists, the CNN talking head suggested that radical gain-of-function experimentation — which Fauci helped fund with taxpayer money at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the likely origin of the COVID-19 pandemic — is "necessary to prepare for the next pandemic, to get ahead of it, to figure out what these viruses can do," albeit now with "better guardrails."Once again, Kennedy gave Bash a reality check, emphasizing that historic efforts to put guardrails around gain-of-function experimentation haven't worked."And clearly, the COVID-19 pandemic and many other global pandemics that we have, have come from gain-of-function research," continued Kennedy. "The RSV epidemic that we have that is the biggest killer of kids in this country today came from these kind of experiments. The Lyme disease almost certainly came from this kind of research. So — and the scientists who you say are experts are making the argument that this is necessary for pandemic response cannot point to one instance in history where research that came out of this kind of experimentation has actually provided us something beneficial."'He was lying, and you were punishing people for not trusting the experts.'Bash, once again finding herself on the back foot, pressed Kennedy on how America might alternatively prepare for the next pandemic.Casting indirect shade on Fauci, Kennedy suggested that COVID made clear what should be done in the future and what should never be done again.In addition to listening to doctors on the ground rather than censoring them, Kennedy said it's essential when faced with another pandemic that the Constitution is strenuously protected.Not getting the responses she apparently wanted, Bash tried changing the topic — but this time Kennedy hit the brakes, blasting the legacy media for "malpractice" during the pandemic and identifying Bash individually as "part of the problem."RELATED: Damning study of over a million kids finds myocarditis only in the vaccinated "Your job is a fierce skepticism toward authority," said Kennedy. "And you weren't doing that. You were beating up on people who were dissenting."Bash, feathers clearly ruffled, launched into her latest defense of the experimental COVID-19 jabs that were nowhere close to being as safe or effective as advertised and were responsible for the deaths of numerous children by the Food and Drug Administration's own admission.After Bash claimed that "the COVID vaccine prevented deaths" and alluded to data suggesting as much, Kennedy asked the host, "You think the COVID vaccine protected children?""Can you show me one study that shows that children were protected by the COVID vaccine?" Kennedy said between interruptions from the defensive host. "That the vaccine did more good than harm to children? Can you show me one study that shows that?""I can tell you that when it comes to the vaccine, there have been studies that show that because of vaccine disinformation, there could have been 100,000 to 200,000 lives in the U.S. saved," said Bash. "But because people didn't get the vaccine, that's why.""You are saying nonsense," responded Kennedy.The secretary wouldn't let the talking head off the hook, saying, "You say you have seen studies. Cite me the study."Bash then tried changing the subject again, this time to talk about measles, but Kennedy claimed that the job of CNN during the pandemic was to scare people — "to put the chyrons up about 'how many people are dying' to get people to comply."Later in the interview — after Bash attempted to blame Kennedy for the recent measles outbreaks only to unwittingly spotlight another consequence of Fauci's ruinous pandemic-era recommendations — the HHS secretary accused the host of repeating narratives "like a parrot.""All you know how to do is repeat things that people told you and say, 'Trust the experts,'" said Kennedy."That's what you did during COVID. Now we know that Anthony Fauci, who was the 'expert,' was lying about everything — about masks, about the social distancing, about natural immunity, about the transmission from the vaccine, about the source of COVID," continued Kennedy. "He was lying, and you were punishing people for not trusting the experts. And now you're rolling out the experts again."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!