FLOOD, EARTHQUAKE, STORM, FIRE, POWER OUTAGE
Are you prepared?
If not, protect your family or yourself for under $160.00
Chef’s Banquet All-purpose Readiness Kit 1 Month Food Storage Supply (330 Servings)

- Illegal alien 'monster' who fired gun into homeless encampment had been given a pass by Democrats TWICE, DHS saysby Carlos Garcia on October 28, 2026 at 11:30 pm
A Venezuelan illegal alien was shot and killed as he was firing a gun into a homeless encampment in the Pilsen neighborhood in Chicago, according to various law enforcement sources.An off-duty Federal Bureau of Investigation agent happened to see 27-year-old Oscar Isaya-Corrales firing at crowds Monday evening and took him down.He had a slew of previous arrests that included 'domestic violence, criminal damage to property, felony retail theft, driving with an expired license.'The agent was driving home when he saw Isaya-Corrales "discharging a firearm into a group of innocent people" near 18th Street and Union Avenue, according to an FBI statement.Chicago police rushed to the scene to find the 41-year-old agent aiming at the wounded gunman, who had been shot in both legs, his chest, and right flank, according to a police report.Isaya-Corrales died at a hospital about an hour later.The agent was unharmed."The FBI takes all shooting incidents involving our agents or task force members seriously," an FBI statement reads. "In accordance with FBI policy, the shooting incident is under review by the FBI’s Inspection Division."The Department of Homeland Security said that Isaya-Corrales had been caught at the border in 2023 but subsequently released "completely unvetted" by the Biden administration.DHS added that he had a slew of previous arrests that included "domestic violence, criminal damage to property, felony retail theft, driving with an expired license, marijuana possession, and several traffic misdemeanors."Isaya-Corrales got another chance after officials in Blue Island, Illinois, refused to honor a detainer request from Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Dec. 2025.RELATED: DHS attorney DEMOLISHES '60 Minutes' reporter over 'law-abiding' illegal aliens narrative in full interview Alderman Byron Sigcho-Lopez issued a statement skeptical of the account from the FBI."What may have happened is, there was a shooting earlier, maybe around the area of the expressway. Someone heard some shots, and then, when neighbors came out, they saw a vehicle that now we know is the FBI agent that came out of the vehicle and shot someone on an e-bike," he said. Isaya-Corrales was homeless himself and had been staying at a shelter. "What prompted the shooting?" Sigcho-Lopez added. "What transpired after the initial gunfire to justify the agent continuing to aim his gun at the victim while he apparently was already shot multiple times and laying on the ground? Was the agent acting alone or part of a taskforce operation? These are questions that only an independent, transparent investigation can answer." DHS was far less skeptical. "God bless this FBI agent for their heroic action," the agency concluded. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
- UNHINGED: Liberal white ladies just dropped a new songby BlazeTV Staff on October 28, 2026 at 11:00 pm
Election season has historically brought plenty of campaign ads, but these days it also brings a fresh crop of painful-to-listen-to liberal anthems penned by white women who are suffering from terminal TDS.“I’m sure everyone has heard the old saying that ... there’s only two things in life that are certain: death and taxes. And I agree, those two things are certain. However, I would like to just deposit a third one just into the atmosphere,” BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales says.“Unhinged liberal white women are going to drop a new song to encourage you to vote as we approach an election,” she continues. “It is certain. It happens every time, and it always is terrible. That is always something that you can hang your hat on.”“We won’t, we won’t ever let go of that hard-won freedom, freedom to vote,” the women sing in the now-viral video.“We the people are for the people,” they continue, clapping to the beat.“The charisma of a doorknob is what they have,” Gonzales comments.“I love, also, that the woman was holding a sign that said, ‘Make it too big to rig.’ Like, can you steal elections or not? I have been reliably informed that that’s not a thing,” she continues.“Now, I will just say ... I’m not done, OK? Because there are other libs who heard this song, and they were like, ‘Yes, this is what we’re doing. It’s the only way to convince people to vote, is for us to just stand on a street corner like the goofy motherf**kers that we are,” she adds.Gonzales plays another video of a group of white women performing the same song, but this time it’s on a stage with instruments and a little more upbeat.“They at least have it. It’s faster. They got more energy,” she says, before playing a clip of yet another new liberal anthem.“My persecution is your persecution, and your persecution is my persecution,” a woman sings in the video.“I’ve fallen asleep five times since the clip started,” Gonzales says. “Those people’s votes count just as much as yours does,” she points out.Want more from Sara Gonzales?To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred takes on news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
- Federal judge sides with Democrats against Trump taxpayer-funded ads — and the White House just respondedby Carlos Garcia on October 28, 2026 at 10:05 pm
An estimated $20 million ad campaign from the Trump administration was blocked by a federal judge who sided with the Democratic National Committee.U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan said Wednesday that the administration could not create or air advertisements using taxpayer funds.'Administrations of both parties have used public service announcements to explain policy and make the case for the nation's direction.'The ad campaign is being challenged in court in three separate lawsuits."Here, there is little doubt that Defendants' unlawful use of public funds makes it more difficult for the DNC to achieve its mission of 'electing Democratic candidates in federal, state, and local elections across the Country,'" AliKhan wrote in the ruling.She added that the administration's "use of public dollars to finance the challenged ads imposes competitive harm on the DNC, causing Democratic campaign prospects to suffer."The judge ordered the Office of Management and Budget and the Department of Homeland Security to "take all necessary actions to cease distribution of the challenged ads, including through authorized third parties."After facing pressure about the ads, the president said he would fund them himself and with money he raised for super PAC MAGA Inc.But AliKhan noted that the ads kept running with a disclosure that read, "Paid for by the U.S. Government."A White House official said the ruling was "moot" and explained why in a statement to the Washington Sun."The PSAs are being paid for by outside groups," the official said. "Administrations of both parties have used public service announcements to explain policy and make the case for the nation's direction." RELATED: Pollster Frank Luntz CRUSHES Democrats' hopes over favorable polling The Sun report noted that both former presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden ran advertisements during their time in office, but those were meant to publicize specific initiatives.AliKhan added in her ruling, "Every public dollar spent on airing the challenged ads allows MAGA Inc. — which has already spent $25,000,000 in the 2025-26 federal election cycle to support Republican candidates and oppose Democratic candidates — to conserve its resources for other political efforts adverse to the DNC."One survey found that a vast majority of Americans, 86%, thought the campaign-style taxpayer-funded ads were inappropriate. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
- Jason Whitlock: This 3-year-old soccer prodigy wasn't the problem — the adults wereby BlazeTV Staff on October 28, 2026 at 9:00 pm
When 3-year-old Nevada Pierre scored 21 goals in two soccer games, the police were called — and his parents were furious.However, upon further investigation, BlazeTV host Jason Whitlock explains that the arrival of the cops had nothing to do with the child dominating the game and everything to do with how his parents reacted.“The parents of 3-year-old Nevada Pierre claimed their son was targeted because he was playing too well against kids older than him,” an ABC news report says.“Nevada’s mother claims other parents had complained, wanting him taken out of the game to give other kids a chance to play, but she didn’t think that was fair."“The parents of the 3-year-old boy that were causing a bit of a scene,” Jason Whitlock explains. “And one of the workers on the soccer field in the soccer league felt annoyed, bothered, felt like this situation could escalate, and he called the police.”“Police came, based off of everything I’ve seen so far, behaved really appropriately. This is a typical little league dispute between parents and coaches and organizers,” he adds.Charles Baker is a coach and a father himself, and he also believes the child’s parents are to blame.“When I first saw this story, I thought it was some kind of AI hoax. And I kept seeing it, and I thought it’s real,” he tells Whitlock. “And ... you look at the headline and you think it’s funny, but then a sensible person would say, ‘Well, let me read and find out the why.’”“And then the why makes sense as to why the police were called. It had nothing to do with how good the little kid was. Everybody admits he’s good. He’s great. He’s way ahead of his time here,” he continues.“The police were called because of comments that the mother was making,” he adds.However, Dre Baldwin believes the first people responsible for this situation “are the organizers of the league.”“This happens in organizations all the time. When you bring a bunch of people together, if the standards are not clearly outlined and clearly communicated, then the wires get crossed,” Baldwin says.“The organizer of the league needs to tell the parents, ‘This is the type of league this is. This is who it’s for. This is our aim. This is our goal,’” he explains.“So the parents show up with this kid who was obviously very good at soccer. He’s dominating the game, and his parents are telling him just go dominate the game, but the league is not designed for this, not a dominate-the-game type of soccer league,” he continues.“It’s a get-used-to-playing-soccer type of league,” he says, adding, “That's on the organizers of the league.”Want more from Jason Whitlock?To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
- Feed has no items.



