FLOOD, EARTHQUAKE, STORM, FIRE, POWER OUTAGE
Are you prepared?
If not, protect your family or yourself for under $160.00
Chef’s Banquet All-purpose Readiness Kit 1 Month Food Storage Supply (330 Servings)


  • Michigan’s Senate primary just exposed an uncomfortable truth about the Democrat Party
    by BlazeTV Staff on August 6, 2026 at 11:00 pm

    Once again, the Democratic Socialists of America have proven that the Democrat establishment can’t outspend its grassroots army.On August 4, progressive candidate Abdul El-Sayed narrowly won the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate over Rep. Haley Stevens, after many DSA members, local chapters, activists, and progressive figures closely tied to the DSA — including Bernie Sanders, AOC, and Rashida Tlaib — mobilized heavily on his behalf.BlazeTV host Nick Freitas says El-Sayed’s victory reveals something deeply unsettling about the direction the Democratic Party is headed. “The establishment probably could not have picked a better candidate for what we would call establishment-style Democrat politics in Michigan than Haley Stevens,” says Freitas, highlighting her “long history with Michigan” and her work on both Hillary Clinton's and Barack Obama’s 2008 campaigns.“She really appealed to the things that you would expect from kind of working-class voters in Michigan … and yet she still lost,” he adds.According to Freitas, there are “two things going on here.”“One, you see the machine Democrat Party recognizing that it's probably going to be a lot harder to win with [El-Sayed] in a swing state, and then I think what you also see is this resurgence of far-left politics … within the Democratic Party that is absolutely dedicated and willing to walk in lockstep,” he explains.Even though Stevens was by no means the “moderate” she was portrayed to be — exemplified by her progressive positions on ICE, abortion, and gun control — Freitas says her classic establishment résumé and deep-pocketed donors made her an easier candidate for the Democrat establishment to get behind.But in the end, it didn’t matter how much money the Democrat machine spent on her. El-Sayed still came out on top because the DSA is where the momentum and energy is right now.“What this confirms is that the DSA is every bit as strong as we anticipated it to be, and I think what this demonstrates is that at least going into the midterms, DSA is going to be riding this wave of victories that they've had within primaries,” says Freitas.“The fact that Abdul Sayed thought this is going to be great for me, and theoretically was, should tell us everything we need to know about where the energy is within the Democratic Party right now,” he continues.The Democrat establishment, Freitas explains, is failing to beat the DSA not because D candidates are actually true moderates — on the contrary, they’re usually still far-left on core issues — but because the DSA is “very, very honest” about its objectives, which appeals to voters.“And then to the extent that [the DSA is] losing, they're only losing in places where they don't have sufficient groundwork or they haven't had the sufficient time to work in order to build up a new generation of voters that hate America every bit as much as they do. So what do they settle for?” he asks.“Well, they settle for candidates who still want to fundamentally change and alter the United States, who still want to allow for mass immigration, who still want to abolish ICE, who still want to abolish prisons or defund the police, but are simply smart enough to not say so out loud,” he answers.Add it all up and the conclusion regarding the current Democratic Party is bleak: “You have the DSA … you have progressive candidates who pretty much want the same things, but are smart enough to know that you can't say everything that you want out loud … and then you have this ever-dwindling portion of ‘moderate’ Democrats.”To hear more, watch the episode above.Start watching Nick Freitas NOW at blazetv.com and use the promo code NICK40 for $40 off your BlazeTV+ subscription.

  • Mitch McConnell releases new statement about his health status — but he's not yet returning to the Senate
    by Carlos Garcia on August 6, 2026 at 10:33 pm

    Former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) released another health update, which said he has been released from a rehabilitation facility after being hospitalized for weeks.McConnell was hospitalized on June 14 after his latest fall and had been moved to a rehabilitation facility, but many skeptics have been demanding that his office provide evidence of his condition.'It is unacceptable that the party who spent four years criticizing Joe Biden's health is now silent on McConnell's.'"On the advice of my doctors, I'll maintain an intensive regimen of physical therapy from home during the state work period, and I'll continue to engage with my staff and colleagues on important Senate business," McConnell said in a statement Thursday.The 84-year-old has been absent from Congress for nearly two months.After the Democratic governor of Kentucky demanded that McConnell provide evidence of his condition, the senator released a photo with his wife and a second photo weeks later.The lack of video fueled conspiracy theorists who speculated a spectrum of possibilities, from McConnell passing away to his being surreptitiously arrested.His absence from Congress has also hamstrung some Republican efforts that depended on his vote to break the slim margin. Among those is the upcoming vote on whether to confirm Todd Blanche for U.S. attorney general. McConnell had already announced that he was not going to run for re-election after becoming the longest-serving Senate leader in U.S. history and the longest-serving senator for Kentucky as well.RELATED: Kentucky governor makes unusual request as mystery deepens over Mitch McConnell's health Some critics continued to demand video of McConnell's health condition."We need the truth about Mitch McConnell NOW. It is unacceptable that the party who spent four years criticizing Joe Biden's health is now silent on McConnell's," Blaze Media co-founder Glenn Beck said on social media. "It is OUR RIGHT to know. That seat isn't McConnell's. It belongs to the people of Kentucky," he added.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

  • Beyond postpartum depression: The troubling truth about Lindsay Clancy’s prescriptions
    by BlazeTV Staff on August 6, 2026 at 9:00 pm

    The story of Lindsay Clancy and the alleged murder of her three children is undeniably heartbreaking. While the jury is still out on what her fate will be, BlazeTV host Allie Beth Stuckey believes it’s important to recognize that she was managing her postpartum depression with 13 different medications prescribed by six different doctors.One of the drugs Clancy was on was an SSRI, which adjusts a person’s level of serotonin.In an interview Stuckey conducted last year with board certified psychiatrist Josef Witt-Doerring, he argued that “one of the problems with all of these drugs, all of these so-called antidepressants, SSRIs, is that studies show that the premise they are based on is actually unsupported by evidence.”“There was a major 2022 review in molecular psychiatry that found no solid evidence that people with depression have lower serotonin levels. And this doctor that I had on my show points out that there is still no blood test. There’s no brain scan that can objectively diagnose depression,” Stuckey explains, noting that it’s simply a "symptom checklist.”“And so, if you are putting someone on something that is affecting their serotonin, which is an important hormone in mood regulation, but that was never the problem in the first place, you’re just giving them the side effects. You’re just giving them the cons and none of the pros from emotional regulation,” she continues.While many people claim that SSRIs have changed their lives, Stuckey points out that it’s possible that having your “emotional response” blunted and your “spectrum of emotions” shortened could bring you back “from the brink of dark depression.”“It doesn’t treat their depression. It doesn’t ever get to the underlying cause, but it is possible that an SSRI can have that effect, but it can also have all of these other effects, especially if the root cause is never addressed,” she explains.And psychiatric medication is increasingly common, with 17% of Americans taking them.“Millions unknowingly are at risk of drug-induced brain damage while being told that their drugs are safe. According to this doctor, Witt-Doerring, patients who stop psychiatric drugs even gradually can suffer protracted withdrawal that feels like permanent brain damage,” Stuckey says.“It can cause neurotoxicity. It can also trigger a condition called tardive dysphoria that includes apathy, dissociation, chronic fatigue, agitation. He notes that multiple people have taken their life because the symptoms from this can be so extreme, it can drive people to suicide,” she continues.Another doctor Stuckey interviewed, Dr. Adam Urato, “warned of the many dangers of being prescribed SSRIs, specifically during pregnancy, but it also applies to that postpartum period.”Urato, chief of maternal fetal medicine at MetroWest Medical Center, “has called for stronger FDA warnings for SSRIs, especially for pregnant mothers.”While women are told that SSRIs won’t affect the baby, cause complications, or affect the breast milk, Urato has claimed that is “not accurate.”“He has highlighted how SSRIs are actually pushed on mothers both before pregnancy, during pregnancy, and after, even though they can alter things like your own brain function, but also fetal brain development,” Stuckey explains.“And so, all of this plays into the defense’s argument that says that, ‘Look, this was beyond her control. Someone dropped the ball here. It wasn’t her. She was trying to get the help that she wanted,’” she says. “That’s what they’re arguing.”Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

  • Trans basketball player dominating French women's league responds to calls to play in WNBA
    by Andrew Chapados on August 6, 2026 at 8:30 pm

    He's only been a woman for five years, but he's ready to bring his hard-nosed style of play to the WNBA.Julie Tétart is not just one of the best players in a league in France; the center absolutely dominated the 2025-2026 season in every relevant category.'It's a childhood dream just like for any female basketball player.'The Monaco player, who stands at 6'2"-6'3" depending on the source, ran through France's Ligue 2 opponents last season and has since revealed the WNBA would be a welcomed next step.Fox News' OutKick caught up with the trans-identifying male athlete to ask if the U.S. women's league was a possibility."If they contact me, I won't say no. But you have to be realistic: I'm old, and there are far better players than me!" the humble player told the outlet on Monday.Calls for a WNBA team to sign Tétart have come during the league's ongoing debate over inclusion. After Indiana Fever player Sophie Cunningham said girls should not have to compete with boys, backlash quickly followed from WNBA fans, coaches, and even an owner.RELATED: World No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka gives blunt answer when asked about gender testing: 'Men are way stronger' Valery HACHE/AFP/Getty Images Multiple WNBA personnel have struggled to separate the idea of barring men from their sport from the rest of their progressive views.Golden State Valkyries coach Natalie Nakase compared the issue to being criticized for her ethnicity, while Fever head coach Stephanie White said she is not "educated enough from a scientific standpoint" to determine whether the league should allow men.She added, "I don't ever believe that exclusion is an answer."Tétart crushing the competitionIt would be hard to imagine a more dominant performance than the one the 34-year-old put on last season. Tétart was the only player in the league to break the 20-points-per-game barrier, averaging 21.2, more than four points ahead of the second-highest scorer.In rebounding, Tétart averaged a massive 20.2 boards per game, almost double the second-highest rebounder, who averaged 10.9 per game.Tétart was also fifth in steals per game, while averaging the most successful free throws and free-throw attempts per game, by a mile.This was all without even being in the top 10 for minutes played per game, for which Tétart was ranked 19th.RELATED: WNBA coach counter-protests Sophie Cunningham with 'trans kids' shirt — Caitlin Clark responds Valery HACHE/AFP/Getty Images Tétart, who according to the New York Post came out as transgender in October 2021, while telling OutKick that playing in the WNBA would be a dream, seemingly hinted at not wanting to go to the U.S. because of President Donald Trump."Obviously, it's a childhood dream just like for any female basketball player, but unfortunately, it's not possible," Tétart said. "The league, yes. The country, no, haha," Tétart continued. However, when pressed further on the subject, the player simply replied, "I won't say no."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!


    Feed has no items.