FLOOD, EARTHQUAKE, STORM, FIRE, POWER OUTAGE
Are you prepared?
If not, protect your family or yourself for under $160.00
Chef’s Banquet All-purpose Readiness Kit 1 Month Food Storage Supply (330 Servings)

- Jason Whitlock torches Ryan Clark’s teary ESPN exit: ‘He couldn’t stay in his lane’by BlazeTV Staff on July 30, 2026 at 7:30 pm
After Ryan Clark was fired from ESPN, he used the opportunity to portray himself as someone who stood on principle and represented his community.But BlazeTV host Jason Whitlock sees a different story and isn’t buying Clark’s latest teary appearance on “The Pivot Podcast.”“What I’m dealing with is, in truth, a first-world problem,” Clark said, before explaining that he represented the black community and “wouldn’t change anything.”“‘Cause that means the world to me,” he said through tears.“First-world problem. His words. And then two minutes of tears,” Whitlock says, before playing more of Clark’s reaction to his firing.“A company who’s going to have the Super Bowl this year, who truly wants to put their best foot forward to the entire world and have the best people talking about football, wouldn’t fire, in my opinion, and it seems to be the opinion of many others, the best football analyst in the world,” Clark said.“The self-proclaimed best football analyst in the world could not decipher his own work situation,” Whitlock comments.“ESPN paid Ryan Clark to do one thing: talk football. That is the contract. That is the whole job description. And he couldn’t stay in his lane,” he adds.Clark also claimed in the interview that he knew that he “couldn’t be too black.”“Nobody asked him to be the racial conscience of Bristol, Connecticut. His bosses didn’t commission it. The audience didn’t demand it. He appointed himself. And then he was surprised when the people writing the checks didn’t appreciate the self-appointment,” Whitlock says.Despite claiming that it was never about the money, Clark went on to complain that he had a life of “excess” taken away from him, which he was using to help his family.“No accountability, no self-awareness, just the excesses, the parents, the nieces, the nephews, the lifestyle they’re accustomed to. Threw it all away,” Whitlock says.“The man who told you it was never about the money, then spent four minutes explaining in precise detail exactly what the money was for, exactly who depended on it, exactly what changes now that it’s gone,” he continues.“He chose the community over his family,” he says, adding, “He thought that made him noble.”Want more from Jason Whitlock?To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
- 'Trust the science' or die: Is being MAHA hazardous to your health?by John Mac Ghlionn on July 30, 2026 at 7:00 pm
If you didn't like Anthony Fauci before, his newly released diaries most likely won't change your opinion. They paint a picture of a spotlight-hungry functionary who projected certainty where little existed and punished dissent when it proved inconvenient.Meanwhile, the "In Fauci We Trust" set are crowing about a new study that claims conservatives are dying at significantly higher rates than liberals largely because they don't trust doctors. It’s a predictable, entirely rational counter-reaction to an establishment that completely torched its own credibility.The narrative is less public health finding than moral vindication: Voting red is apparently a terminal diagnosis, and skepticism toward the medical establishment is a self-inflicted death sentence. It’s a beautifully smug theory, provided you don't look too closely at how the physical universe actually works.Old newsLet’s start with the most glaringly obvious flaw in this supposedly groundbreaking research. The authors act utterly baffled by a widening mortality gap between 2020 and 2022, noting with analytical horror that more "very conservative" respondents suffered fatal health failures than "very liberal" ones.They claim they controlled for age, but anyone with a basic grasp of American demographics knows who populates these ideological buckets. The conservative base overwhelmingly skews older, grayer, and more rural. The "very liberal" cohort is heavily populated by 20-something urbanites whose greatest health risk is a poorly navigated electric scooter.Shocking news, everyone: An aging population of grandparents in America's heartland are dying of heart disease and stroke faster than a bunch of college-educated baristas in Brooklyn. You don’t need a multimillion-dollar grant to solve that mystery.Trust fallThe study's real target isn't biology but the conservative psyche. The researchers discuss a trust deficit, lamenting that the right has developed a pathological aversion to medical authorities. They treat this skepticism like a bizarre, localized mental glitch, completely ignoring the fact that the medical establishment spent years earning every single ounce of that hostility.Conservative mistrust of institutional science didn't emerge from a vacuum, nor was it cooked up by unhinged lunatics on social media. It was forged in the absolute dumpster fire of the COVID-19 response.For two years, the public was subjected to an unprecedented psychological experiment run by federal health bureaucrats who changed their official directives as often as they changed their socks. Remember when masks were useless, then mandatory, then so effective you needed to wear two at once, all based on "The Science" that conveniently shifted to match political pressures?RELATED: Puppy love: Diary exposes Fauci's crush on Julia Roberts Anna Moneymaker/Getty ImagesShot in the darkThen came the vaccines, rolled out at warp speed with the solemn institutional promise that they would stop transmission dead in its tracks. When that turned out to be completely false, the goalposts weren’t just moved — they were loaded onto a flatbed truck and driven across state lines. Instead of acknowledging the technology's numerous limitations, the establishment doubled down, turning a pharmaceutical product into a loyalty oath.If you want to know why a farmer in Ohio is hesitant to take blood pressure medication today, look no farther than the sheer cruelty of the mass lockdowns.People watched their life savings evaporate as local authorities forced small, independent businesses to close while letting multibillion-dollar corporate retail giants stay open with zero restrictions.Tens of thousands of workers were handed an ultimatum: Take an experimental shot or lose your livelihood. Those who refused were promptly unpersoned. They were banished from polite society, labeled domestic threats, and, in some of the most dystopian twists, de-banked and financially marooned by institutions that decided political compliance was a prerequisite for access to their own money.Screen deathWorst of all was the profound, institutionalized inhumanity enforced at the hospital doors. Americans across the country were forced to watch their parents and spouses die through FaceTime screens because draconian hospital policies forbade them to hold loved ones' hands in their final moments.Meanwhile, health officials suddenly discovered that the virus was highly politically literate, giving a free pass to the massive BLM and George Floyd riots because they deemed the cause to be a higher priority than viral containment.Apparently, the COVID-19 virus was deeply moved by the social justice movement and agreed to pause transmission for the summer, so long as you were burning down a local Wendy’s instead of trying to run your small business. The hypocrisy was loud, proud, and thoroughly televised.Survival instinctSo when federal health policy undergoes a massive shake-up and movements like "Make America Healthy Again" gain real traction, it’s not an anti-science cult. Quite the opposite. It’s a predictable, entirely rational counter-reaction to an establishment that completely torched its own credibility. Trust is slowly earned and quickly lost, and institutions spent two years treating their remaining credibility like a game of Jenga.Skepticism toward a medical system that got so much wrong, so destructively, is less a sign of ignorance than a basic survival instinct. If conservatives are looking at the medical establishment with a heavy dose of side-eye these days, it’s for good reason. The memories of being locked down, masked up, and lied to still burn like a bad rash.
- Seattle mayor reportedly asks police chief to resignby Dave Urbanski on July 30, 2026 at 6:30 pm
Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson has asked Seattle Police Chief Shon Barnes to resign, KIRO-TV reported, citing sources.The report comes days after a shooting at a city food festival in which three people were killed and four were wounded.'I have been here working as hard as I can for this city from the day I got here. Do you got that?'KIRO said Seattle Police had no comment about the chief, and the mayor's office had not yet responded to the station.The station added that sources also confirmed that Assistant Chief Tyrone Davis — who's been with the department since 1999 — will be the next appointment, but it's not clear if that is an interim or permanent position. The city of Seattle and its police department have come under scrutiny for waiting several hours Sunday before addressing the public or providing updates about the deadly shooting, KIRO said.KIRO added that Barnes was out of town Sunday when the shooting took place — and was absent from the initial press conference held late Sunday night. He told reporters he was attending the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Officers conference in Dallas, the station said.RELATED: Deadly Seattle shooting: Arrested suspect is just 15 years old; cops say there were 2 other suspects — 1 killed, 1 unknown Barnes was back in Seattle on Monday. KIRO said a local reporter during a news conference grilled Barnes about his travel schedule and splitting his time between Seattle and Chicago, where his family lives.Then things got heated, with Barnes telling the reporter, "I don't have to tell you where I go. ... I have been here working as hard as I can for this city from the day I got here. Do you got that?" Barnes defended his reaction at another news conference, saying he wouldn't have described the exchange as "heated" but rather that his "passion" was on display while he defended his integrity, the Seattle Times reported.More from KIRO:KIRO 7 was set to interview Barnes on Wednesday to talk about his travel schedule, but it was rescheduled. According to other news outlets in the area, Barnes had several interviews scheduled for Wednesday, July 29, but they were all canceled or rescheduled.KIRO 7’s interview was rescheduled for today, Thursday, July 30, but we have not heard whether Barnes will still be doing that interview.A coalition of black community organizations in Seattle is coming together to support Barnes and oppose his apparent removal, the Seattle Medium reported.The coalition includes the NAACP Seattle Branch, Community Passageways, the Urban League of Metropolitan Seattle, Seattle Clergy, Parents for Student Success, 100 Black Parents, Creative Black Brilliance Braintrust, the Martin Luther King Jr. Commemoration Committee, and the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives, the outlet added.Barnes was sworn in on July 9, 2025, as the city’s 38th police chief, KIRO said, adding that he previously served as interim police chief starting in January 2025 following the departure of former Chief Adrian Diaz.The Times said Barnes had been brought to the department as a "hard reset" following Diaz's firing, adding that former Mayor Bruce Harrell let him go amid allegations that Diaz covered up an affair with a subordinate.After Diaz, the city opened the police chief candidate pool to a nationwide search, KIRO noted.The Times reported that after Wilson defeated Harrell by just over 2,000 votes last fall, Wilson announced in December that she was keeping Barnes as chief.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
- Monty Python's John Cleese backs deportation champion Rupert Lowe, tells off haters: 'Some cultures are better than others'by Joseph MacKinnon on July 30, 2026 at 6:10 pm
Anti-woke comedian and writer John Cleese has come out swinging in support of Rupert Lowe, the Restore Britain leader who has become a magnet for leftist abuse over his criticism of mass migration and systemic anti-white racism.On Sunday, an X user who goes by "The English Crusader" shared an image of Rupert Lowe captioned, "What is the first word that comes into your mind?"'I am not a racist. I am a culturalist.'Cleese, a former supporter of the Liberal Democrats, responded, "I trust this man more than any of the other leaders."Lowe is a member of the British Parliament who departed Nigel Farage's Reform U.K. party early last year on bad terms. He then founded Restore Britain in February as a party "for those who believe that our nation has been hollowed out by weak leadership, broken institutions, and a political class that no longer serves the people."Although presently nowhere close to having the numbers or the support sufficient to displace Reform or one of the legacy parties in Westminster, Lowe and his party have nevertheless made a significant splash in British politics. According to YouGov, Lowe is the third-most popular public figure in the United Kingdom.Cleese appears to support Lowe and his party chiefly for its proposed approach to immigration — overwhelmingly the most important issue for Restore Britain voters, recent polling shows.RELATED: 'I don't care': Meet the man building Britain's new populist, anti-immigration right Clemens Bilan/Getty ImagesWhile appreciated by Lowe, Cleese's recent political advocacy has ruffled quite a few feathers across the Atlantic.Alastair Campbell, a political strategist who served as a spokesman for former Prime Minister Tony Blair as well as for the Labour Party, was among those prickled by Cleese's comments, accusing the comedian of having "totally lost the plot."So-called immigration policy expert Zoe Gardner attributed Cleese's support for Lowe to "brain worms."Deluged with similar reactions online, Cleese silly-walked over his critics' hurt feelings, noting, "I see I am being ritually insulted for my support of this man. The uneducated call me a racist. I am not a racist. I am a culturalist. I believe that some cultures are better than others."Cleese added that he prefers cultures that "do not advocate stoning, pederasty, wife beating, female genital mutilation, and beheading opponents."Again, Cleese's critics seethed, but this time the world's richest man, Elon Musk, weighed in, stating, "John Cleese has (all too rare) common sense."The comedian has shown no signs of stopping when it comes to sharing posts supportive of Lowe and Restore Britain.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
- Feed has no items.



